Richfeel Vashi Clinic Reviews

Due to an unhealthy lifestyle, a lot of people are experiencing various hair related problems. Their concerns aggravate when they are not able to find a suitable solution. Here, we will review Richfeel Vashi Clinic services. The Richfeel Clinic is situated in the Vashi suburb of Mumbai. They offer a wide range of services related to hair and scalp problems. Some of the renowned treatments offered at Richfeel Vashi Clinic are:

  • Anagrow – Hair Thinning Treatment
  • Hair Transplant – Permanent Hair Restoration
  • TST+ – Hair Fall Treatment
  • Anacover – Permanent Scalp Cover
  • Hair System – Non-Surgical Hair Restoration
  • Anagain Hair Loss Treatment
  • ANA-D-TOX – Hair Color Damage Repair

If you are considering availing Richfeel Vashi Clinic services for hair loss and hair treatment, then read this detailed review before finalizing your decision.

Medical Effectiveness for Hair Transplant and Hair Growth – 4/5

Richfeel medicines are the secret behind their immense success. Whether its hair fall or hair color damage; Richfeel’s medicines and lotions are effective in every treatment. Their indigenous product, Anagrow, is made from elements like Green Apple, Pea Plan, Argan, etc.  Other medicines are also developed using ingredients that do not have any side effects on consumption and application. So if we consider medical effectiveness, Richfeel Vashi Clinic does a commendable job here.

Staff Expertise in Hair Transplantation Treatment – 4/5

For an effective treatment, you require an in-depth analysis. This factor is concerned with the Trichologists at Richfeel Vashi Clinic. The experts devote ample time while diagnosing the medical situation. From an itchy scalp to the hair transplant, you are ensured of expert services in every treatment. In the treatment process, a patient is entitled to receive periodic consultations with the Trichologists at Richfeel Vashi Clinic.

Customer Services post Treatment – 4/5

A customer demands timely services during the course of treatment. Without proper communication, the treatment process can get hampered. The customer management department at Richfeel Vashi Clinic does a fabulous job with respect to customer management. Whether it’s consultation or genuine guidance, you can trust Richfeel executives.

Richfeel Product Effectiveness  – 4/5

Richfeel products are not confined to the hair treatment. These are available for skin issues as well. As per our review of the Richfeel products, these are effective in combating the problems. Most of the products contain natural ingredients and hence, it does not render any side effects after use. Along with the medication, you can incorporate Richfeel products for speedy recovery.

Value for Money – 3.5/5

Richfeel services are worth the price a customer pays for the treatment. Right from consultation to the treatment of the condition, you are entitled to receive personalized services. The prices may appear on the higher side. But, according to the services and the results, a customer feels satisfied with the valuable services.

Pros of Richfeel Hair Treatment ( Hair Loss and Transplantation)

  • Richfeel Vashi Clinic offers a complete hair treatment package including consultation, medication, tests, surgery, diet, and hair products
  • They incorporate latest technological equipment for the tests and the treatments
  • They follow a customer-oriented approach. All information is intimidated on time.
  • They have a well-qualified team of Trichologists
  • Higher probability of recovering from the disease when you are at Richfeel Vashi Clinic

Cons of Richfeel Hair Treatment ( Hair Loss and Transplantation)

  • The prices are slightly higher for the various hair treatments available at Richfeel Vashi Clinic
  • Strict adherence to the diet and medication is required. If a patient does not follow the regimen diligently, chances of recovery may dwindle
  • The treatment takes a long time. It requires a lot of patience while undergoing a hair transplant treatment

Karma Review

Richfeel Vashi Clinic offers a customized approach for all the patients. On availing consultation, a patient is required to provide all the required personal details. After this, Richfeel conducts analysis and tests. This is an important step for diagnosing the root cause of the problem. The tests like Trichoanalysis, Capiloscopy, and HTMA are very effective during the diagnosis process. This is one of the reasons why Richfeel Vashi Clinic deserves a positive recommendation for hair treatment.

Along with the diagnosis, their medicines and products are quite effective in the treatment. They also provide a diet plan so that your body gets the required nutrients and minerals for healthy hair and skin. If you adhere to the guidance during the treatment process, you are going to experience a quick recovery. According to our review, Richfeel Vashi Clinic deserves a thumbs up.

Would I buy Richfeel Vashi Clinic Hair Treatment services?

The answer is, definitely yes! Given their expertise, numerous successful case studies, and our detailed review; we strongly recommend Richfeel Vashi Clinic for hair treatment services.

Dabur Vatika Enriched Coconut Hair Oil Review

Dabur is one of the oldest Ayurvedic manufacturers in the Indian subcontinent. It was established in 1884. Dabur is a household name now and Dabur Vatika Enriched Coconut Hair Oil is one of the most renowned products from Dabur. If you go through your family history, there will be a particular family member who regularly uses Dabur Vatika Enriched Coconut Hair Oil. Over the years, Dabur has developed Dabur Vatika Enriched Coconut Hair Oil. This oil contains 8 herbs that impart the much-needed benefits for hair. These herbs are:

  • Triphala
  • Brahmi
  • Henna
  • Neem
  • Lemon
  • Rosemary Oil
  • Kapurkachri
  • Soy Extracts

The goodness of coconut oil is well-known. Now, Vatika Hair Oil incorporates other natural ingredients as well. Does it increases the benefits of Vatika Hair Oil or degrades the quality of the product? For this purpose, we have conducted an extensive review of Dabur Vatika Enriched Coconut Hair Oil. Let us have a look at it.

Effectiveness – 4.5/5

Coconut oil is the ultimate solution for dry and dull hair. It is a well-known fact that coconut oil helps in restoring or maintaining the shine and thickness of the hair. Dabur Vatika Enriched Coconut Hair Oil accomplishes this task with perfection. If you are struggling with frizzy hair, buy this coconut oil to tame your hair. If the luster in your hair is degrading day by day, you should definitely use Vatika Hair Oil. The after effects of this oil are simply amazing.

Value for Money – 5/5

You can grab a 300 ml bottle of Dabur Vatika Hair Oil for juts Rs 167. The price of coconut oil seems to be expensive. But, you should know that this is not just coconut oil. It is herbal oil with the benefits of herbs like Amla, Neem, Henna, etc. So if you are getting herbal oil at this price, it fairly reasonable. Moreover, if you consider the benefits, then it is surely one of the best buys in the market.

Ingredients and Product Quality – 4.5/5

Talking about the ingredients, this is what makes it unique than other hair oils. The presence of 8 herbs elevates the enriched benefits associated with this hair oil. The three most prominent ingredients are – lemon, henna, and Amla. Lemon is helpful in preventing dandruff by restricting sebum formation on the scalp. Henna nourishes the hair and prevents dryness. Amla assists in strengthening hair follicles and increasing the density of hair.

Apart from this, this coconut oil is non-sticky, very light, and smells great!

Usage – 5/5

The manufacturers recommend massaging your scalp with Dabur Vatika Enriched Coconut Hair Oil one hour before shampooing your hair. After rinsing your oiled hair, you will notice a considerable difference in the quality. You can also apply oil and leave it overnight. This will also work wonders. In both the cases, you will witness splendid results.

Pros of Dabur Vatika Enriched Coconut Hair Oil

  • Dabur is a household brand and hence, it is easily available at all locations
  • Being an Ayurvedic product, it suits all types of hair and does not pose any side effects as well
  • The reasonable price is surely an added advantage
  • It protects your hair against any damage and provides an overall treatment like preventing dandruff, strengthening roots, imparting shine, promoting thick and strong hair

Cons of Dabur Vatika Enriched Coconut Hair Oil

  • You need to apply it regularly to notice effective results. You cannot expect healthy hair if you don’t massage your scalp regularly with Dabur Vatika Enriched Coconut Hair Oil
  • If you live in colder regions, this coconut oil may freeze due to low temperature. Keep it in a warm place to prevent solidification

Karma Review

Extract the benefits of the nature with Dabur Vatika Enriched Coconut Hair Oil. Instead of opting for useful therapies and clinical treatments, save your money by applying coconut oil. The coconut oil, along with natural herbs, keeps your hair and scalp healthy. It prevents hair loss and makes your hair healthy and shinier.

You can easily purchase this product from any local shop, supermarket, or any online store. Moreover, the reasonable price of Dabur Vatika Enriched Coconut Oil is suitable for each and everyone. With regular usage, you can notice effective results over a course of time.

Would I Buy Dabur Vatika Enriched Coconut Oil?

Certainly! Dabur Vatika Enriched Coconut Oil is one of the best products for hair care available in the market.

Dr. Batra Hair Treatment Review

Homeopathic treatment is a safe and secure way to deal with your health problems. Dr. Batra’s offer homeopathic treatment for hair related problems such as hair fall, thinning of hair, baldness, and others. Dr. Batra’s provides hair treatment using its latest technological equipment, homeopathic medicines, and professional advice. But, is Dr. Batra Hair Treatment worth considering? Read on to know more.

Dr. Batra’s hair treatment comprises of the following services

  • Batra’s Homeopathy
  • Dr. Batra’s GroHair
  • Instant Hair by Dr. Batra
  • Batra’s Hair Transplant
  • STMCell Treatment  by Dr. Batra
  • Batra’s Quick Hair

Your scalp and hair condition determines the type of hair treatment. Whether you should opt for Dr. Batra’s hair treatment or not; read our extensive Dr. Batra hair treatment review before affirming your decision.

Medicines Effectiveness – 2.5/5

Dr. Batra’s medicines are effective for skin treatments but when it comes to hair treatment, the medicines fail to produce any significant effect. You may experience a short-term benefit but in the long run, it stops producing results. Moreover, the medicine packaging does not display the ingredient composition. This factor keeps the customer in an ambiguity over the medicine composition.

Staff Expertise – 2.5/5

Our review on Dr. Batra’s doctors expertise indicates that they follow a pre-determined approach. They abide by certain guidelines while rendering the treatment. They need to break this monotony and examine the patient with an in-depth approach. The doctors prescribe the future course of treatment on the basis of specific criteria. Instead, they should inspect each and every detail minutely before concluding with the treatment. This approach is one of the major reasons for utter dissatisfaction.

Customer Services – 3/5

Promotion is necessary for building awareness and garnering precious clients. But when you do so, on the basis of false promises, you are ruining your reputation. The same is true for Dr. Batra’s. They lure clients on the basis of giving discounts on their expensive services or spam their email account with promotional emails. At last, when the client gets nothing but peanuts, the client feels cheated and disheartened.

Product Effectiveness – 3/5

There is nothing new about Dr. Batra’s hair care products. These are similar to the other hair care products available in the market. In fact, you might get better products that propel thick and lustrous hair growth.

Value for Money – 2.5/5

After analyzing all the parameters, we can conclude that Dr. Batra’s does not provide relevant hair treatment services as per the expectations. Moreover, their consultation fees and treatment costs are expensive, considering homeopathic treatment. When a patient does not get results after a long course of a year or so, he or she loses the money and time without noticing any significant improvement.

Pros of Dr. Batra Hair Treatment

  • Batra’s follows a systematic approach to proper management of every department; whether it is medicines, tests, customer services, etc.
  • Easily accessible due to their well-established presence across the country and the world
  • Homeopathic treatment does not produce any side effects
  • Batra’s offer solutions for each and every kind of hair problem. From hair fall to hair transplants; there is everything available under the canvas of Dr. Batra’s

Cons of Dr. Batra Hair Treatment

  • The hair treatments are expensive. And since the homeopathic treatment takes time, the patient feels the burden in the long run
  • Their focus is more on brand building rather than effective treatment. This is a major cause of customer dissatisfaction
  • The treatment does not produce any noticeable results

Karma Review

Dr. Batra’s enjoys a great reputation for its medical treatments. But in the hair treatment segment, it seems to lag behind. You can equip your medical clinics with the latest equipment but, you need to identify the root cause of the problem as well. You need to offer effective medicines that can actually produce results. Unfortunately, Dr. Batra’s fails to deliver on these aspects.

Their major emphasis is on increasing their client database. Their major forte is to market themselves by creating excellent infrastructure and viable marketing campaign. However, this cannot deliver any prominent results. They need to emphasize on their treatment methodology. The patients with minor hair fall issues or those who opted for hair transplant, everyone have a negative impression about Dr. Batra’s hair treatment services.

Would I buy Dr. Batra’s hair treatment services?

As per our review, we do not recommend Dr. Batra’s hair treatment services. Customer dissatisfaction, expensive treatments, and negligible improvements are the major reasons for not availing Dr. Batra’s services.

Richfeel Reviews : Is richfeel good ? Is the treatment effective ?

Are you thinking of getting a hair treatment done ? It is time to make a decision because the right hair treatment can improve your overall personality. Digital karma conducts extensive background checks and research and based on this research, we build our review. Apart from using our internal research, Digital Karma also takes into account, the real customer feedback from mediums such as Quora, Facebook, YouTube and blogs to check if Richfeel is really effective for most people ! Richfeel reviews from real people can never disappoint and it helps you to make a wise decision before you invest in any hair treatment services. Take a quick look at the Richfeel reviews to make an informed decision that you would never regret!

Real Reviews of Customers that will help you to make a wise decision!

  • Richfeel has changed my life and the way people look at me now! I was partially bald and I started looking really old at the age of 26! My friend told me about Richfeel Hair treatment and I thought of giving it a try! Now, I feel younger and they ask me what has changed! I am really satisfied with the treatment and I would recommend it to all.” – Raghav Sachdeva
  • There was a time that when my hair was really thin. I had immense hair fall. Being a 27 year old girl, my parents were looking for a boy for me and there were many rejected proposals because my dull and lifeless hair made me look older. I tried the richfeel treatment and I do not see much difference. After reading positive Richfeel reviews, I was expecting more from the treatment.”  – Ila Sharma
  • I am a 24 year old girl and I shifted to a new place for my further studies. Due to the hard water and the pollution in the air, my hair started falling and I was very troubled with it. Richfeel hair treatment has controlled my hair loss and now, I have beautiful hair. It is very hard to manage your hair while studying but with Richfeel, my hair feels rich, happy and manageable.” – Paridhi Gupta
  • I am 28 and I started getting grey hair. Was it the water? Was it stress?  I do not know! My fiancé made fun of me because of the premature greying of hair. My colleague showed me a YouTube video of Richfeel hair treatment. It is an effective treatment but it is very time-consuming.” – Misha
  • Thank you, Richfeel! I was bald and after the hair transplantation Richfeel treatment, I have hair on my head. I used to feel conscious and now, I feel confident and young. The only trouble is that it was out of my budget. However, good things come with a price.” – Sayantanu Dutta  

You may watch what deepak has to say about Richfeel –

Everything You Need to Know about RichFeel’s Anagrow Hair Thinning Treatment

We associate youth with rich and healthy hair! Every time we see an advertisement on the television, we wish that our hair was as gorgeous and shiny as the model’s hair. When you start ageing, thick and smooth hair becomes a distant dream. What to do in such scenarios? RichFeel offers you Anagrow Hair treatment which helps you to get your thick and long hair days back. Anagrow treatment is a plant stem cell therapy which controls hair loss. The origin of this effective treatment is Swiss-Italian. According to RichFeel hair treatment review on YouTube channels and blogs, we found out that the anagrow hair treatment has proved to be really helpful for most of the clients.

There is an Anagrow10 x Machine which helps in fighting the five signs of hair thinning. It detoxifies the scalp and removes DHT. DHT is the main cause of thinning of hair in both men and women. It is basically a three step procedure which includes detox, rejuvenation and vaculase. In this treatment, there are revitalising properties in the ingredients like Green Apple, Argan, Pea Plant and Nano-Lipobelle Coenzyme Q10. It facilitates hair growth and gives you thick and shiny hair.  Also, it will help you to mask the bald patches on your head. The treatment has worked for many people and there is no harm to opt for this treatment. It is completely safe and many customers have given positive reviews for the same.

Useful Richfeel Reviews from Real Customers –

  • “I was apprehensive to try the anagrow hair treatment! I was worried that I will lose more hair. However, it was time for me to do something about my thin hair and so, I went for the treatment. It did not work well for me! I did not lose hair but there is no change.” – Nisha
  • “I am 23 and I lost a lot of hair due to hard water. It was terrible! Being a girl, I used to feel ashamed that I have such thin and lifeless hair. After going for RichFeel hair treatment, you will not believe your eyes because my hair looks so glossy and thick. I would recommend the RichFeel anagrow hair treatment.” – Sonali Kashyap
  • “Hello! I am studying for UPSC and I lost hair due to tension and many other reasons. Being young boy and I became concerned about my looks as everybody started teasing me for my thin hair. I took out time and went for the RichFeel hair treatment. It has changed my life! I am a handsome man now and I feel so young!” – Rishi Raj
  • “I was scared to go for the RichFeel hair treatment.  My friends told me to go for it because they had seen results. I do not see much improvement. I do not know why it is taking so much time!” – Manish Khattar

Watch the feedback of Pranjal Pawar on his hair loss treatment at Richfeel –

What should you keep in mind before opting for RichFeel Hair Treatment?

RichFeel hair treatment has proved to be effective for some people. However, you need to keep certain points in mind, before you opt for the treatment. The treatment takes time and so, you have to be prepared to take out time. Although there will be no scarring during the procedure but there will be small pits that will eventually heal. The treatment does not involve major surgery and it is performed under local anaesthesia. This is a permanent solution for hair thinning and baldness. You will be happy with your decision of choosing RichFeel. Most of the RichFeel hair treatment review on Quora and blogs were positive.

Pros and Cons of the Treatment

Pros Cons
Clinically Tested. Safe treatment Time-consuming hair treatment
Effective for hair thinning and baldness
Qualified doctors perform the treatment
Positive reviews from customers. Trusted treatment.

How to proceed for the RichFeel hair treatment?

When you face hair problems such as baldness, hair thinning and greying, your confidence levels go down and you wish for a solution. RichFeel hair treatment has been effective for some people. Hair loss should not put an end to your youth days. Stress can make your hair grey and lifeless. You can take a free consultation before going for the treatment. It is advisable for you to read more reviews and go through the pros and cons before you decide to go for the treatment. RichFeel has received a mixed feedback and we did a research across different parts of the country and they feel that RichFeel hair treatment is safe and effective.

Final Verdict

As a team, we researched and did a survey and we received positive feedback from people. They tried the hair treatment and it has worked well for them! We have heard good things about the treatment and there is no harm in trying it. It may solve the problem of hair fall, baldness and greying. Will we suggest it to our readers? After reading blogs and watching videos, we are convinced that the RichFeel anagrow and hair treatment will be a wise decision for you. If you can afford it and have the time, you should go for it.

Sony Ps3 vs Nintendo wii

The never ending battle of gaming consoles has been resolved.

Check out this video to see gaming consoles in a way you have never seen before.

Evolution: South Park Version

South Park is an animated American television comedy series created and written by Trey Parker and Matt Stone. The series has been distributed and aired by Comedy Central since 1997. The show revolves around the adventures of four boys and their friends living in the small town of South Park, Colorado. The show is well-known for its pop culture parody, scatological humor, and satirical handling of current events. Since its debut on August 13, 1997, the show has aired 177 episodes over 12 seasons.

Anecdotes about Vlad Dracula

  1. Vlad The Golden Cup

    Vlad Dracula was known throughout his land for his fierce insistence on honesty and order. Thieves seldom dared practice their trade within his domain, for they knew that the stake awaited any who were caught. Vlad was so confident in the effectiveness of his law that he laced a golden cup on display in the central square of Tirgoviste. The cup was never stolen and remained entirely unmolested throughout Vlad Dracula’s reign.

  2. The Burning of the Sick and Poor
    Vlad Dracula was very concerned that all his subjects work and contribute to the common welfare. He once notice that the poor, vagrants, beggars and cripples had become very numerous in his land. Consequently, he issued an invitation to all the poor and sick in Wallachia to come to Tirgoviste for a great feast, claiming that no one should go hungry in his land. As the poor and crippled arrived in the city they were ushered into a great hall where a fabulous feast was prepared for them. The guests ate and drank late into the night. Vlad himself then made an appearance and asked them, “What else do you desire? Do you want to be without cares, lacking nothing in this world?” When they responded positively Vlad ordered the hall boarded up and set on fire. None escaped the flames. Vlad explained his action to the boyars by claiming that he did this “in order that they represent no further burden to other men, and that no one will be poor in my realm.”
  3. The Foreign Ambassadors
    Although there are some discrepancies between the German and Russian pamphlets in the interpretation of this story, they agree to the following: Two ambassadors of a foreign power visited Vlad’s court at Tirgoviste. When in the presence of the prince, they refused to remove their hats. Vlad ordered that the hats be nailed to their heads, such that they should never have to remove them again.
    Note: The nailing of hats to the heads of those who displeased a monarch was not an unknown act in eastern Europe and by the princes of Moscow.
  4. The Foreign Merchant
    A merchant from a foreign land visited Tirgoviste. Aware of the reputation of Vlad Dracula’s land for honesty, he left a treasure-laden cart unguarded in the street over night. Upon returning to his wagon in the morning, the merchant was shocked to find 160 golden ducats missing. Then the merchant complained of his loss to the prince, Vlad assured him that his money would be returned. Vlad Dracula then issued a proclamation to the city—find the thief and return the money or the city will be destroyed. During the night he ordered that 160 ducats plus one extra be taken from his own treasury and placed in the merchant’s cart. On returning to his cart the next morning and counting his money the merchant discovered the extra ducat. The merchant returned to Vlad and reported that his money had indeed been returned plus an extra ducat. Meanwhile the thief had been captured and turned over to the prince’s guards along with the stolen money. Vlad ordered the thief impaled and informed the merchant that if he had not reported the extra ducat he would have been impaled alongside the thief.
  5. The Lazy Woman
    Vlad once noticed a man working in the fields while wearing a caftan (shirt) that he adjudged to be too short in length. The prince stopped and asked to see the man’s wife. When the woman was brought before him he asked her how she spent her days. The poor, frightened woman stated that she spent her days washing, baking and sewing. The prince pointed out her husband’s short caftan as evidence of her laziness and dishonesty and ordered her impaled, despite her husband’s protestations that he was well satisfied with his wife. Vlad then ordered another woman to marry the peasant but admonished her to work hard or she would suffer the same fate.
    Find more information here

Celebrity : The Atheist, The Agnostic and The Ambigous

I have found this great list of celebrityes and their beliefs. I will post here only a few of them that i found to be more interesting. For the rest of them check the link(its a big list).

The Atheist and the Materialist

Isaac Asimov
Isaac Asimov (1920 – 1992) was a science-fiction writer and science popularizer who wrote an enormous number of books about a wide variety of subjects, including history, Shakespeare, and the Bible.
[I]f I were not an atheist, I would believe in a God who would choose to save people on the basis of the totality of their lives and not the pattern of their words. I think he would prefer an honest and righteous atheist to a TV preacher whose every word is God, God, God, and whose every deed is foul, foul, foul. — Isaac Asimov, I. Asimov: A Memoir
I am an atheist, out and out. It took me a long time to say it. Ive been an atheist for years and years, but somehow I felt it was intellectually unrespectable to say one was an atheist, because it assumed knowledge that one didnt have. Somehow it was better to say one was a humanist or an agnostic. I finally decided that Im a creature of emotion as well as of reason. Emotionally I am an atheist. I dont have the evidence to prove that God doesnt exist, but I so strongly suspect he doesnt that I dont want to waste my time. — Isaac Asimov, in “Free Inquiry”, Spring 1982, vol.2 no.2, p. 9
Although the time of death is approaching me, I am not afraid of dying and going to Hell or (what would be considerably worse) going to the popularized version of Heaven. I expect death to be nothingness and, for removing me from all possible fears of death, I am thankful to atheism. –Isaac Asimov, “On Religiosity,” Free Inquiry ††
When I die I wont go to heaven or hell, there will just be nothingness. — Isaac Asimov, interviewed in Bill Moyers television series “A World of Ideas”

David Cronenberg: Director
In a February 1992 interview in Esquire magazine Cronenberg is said to describe himself as “not just an atheist, but a total nonbeliever.”
From an interview in Film Threat, February 1997, p. 11:
Q: Most of your films deal with various characters personal spirituality, yet you have never dealt directly with religion.
A: The reason why is that Im not interested. Youre absolutely right. For me, its not even worth discussion. It doesnt interest me. It interests me only to be discarded. If I start there, Im mired in a discussion that is very unfruitful to me. Im simply a non-believer and have been forever. To discuss religion is to put me in a debate with myself. Im interested in saying, “Let us discuss the existential question. We are all going to die, that is the end of all consciousness. There is no afterlife. There is no God. Now what do we do.” Thats the point where it starts getting interesting to me. If I have to go back and say, “What if there is a God?” then Im doing a debate that is not very interesting. You have to create one character who believes and another that doesnt. Its not an issue.
and on pp. 11-12:
Q. How were you raised?
A. Im an atheist and my parents were both atheists so it was never a big issue, and if I wanted to become an Orthodox Jew, it was never, “You must not do that.” And I certainly went through all those things as a kid wondering about the existence of God or not, but at a very early age, I decided we made it up because we were afraid and it was one way to make things palatable.

Fidel Castro: Cuban Leader
A wire service story writes of his audience with the pope: “Castro was educated by Jesuit priests as a young man, but later shed his religion for revolution, Marxism and atheism. Nonetheless, he bowed slightly when he met the pope and told him it was a great honor to be in the Vatican.”
Bill Gates
Gates was interviewed November 1995 on PBS by David Frost. Below is the transcript with minor edits.
Frost: Do you believe in the Sermon on the Mount?
Gates: I dont. Im not somebody who goes to church on a regular basis. The specific elements of Christianity are not something Im a huge believer in. Theres a lot of merit in the moral aspects of religion. I think it can have a very very positive impact.
Frost: I sometimes say to people, do you believe there is a god, or do you know there is a god? And, youd say you dont know?
Gates: In terms of doing things I take a fairly scientific approach to why things happen and how they happen. I dont know if theres a god or not, but I think religious principles are quite valid.
Gates was profiled in a January 13, 1996 TIME magazine cover story. Here are some excerpts compiled by the Drudge Report:
“Isnt there something special, perhaps even divine, about the human soul?” interviewer Walter Isaacson asks Gates “His face suddenly becomes expressionless,” writes Isaacson, “his squeaky voice turns toneless, and he folds his arms across his belly and vigorously rocks back and forth in a mannerism that has become so mimicked at MICROSOFT that a meeting there can resemble a round table of ecstatic rabbis.”
“I dont have any evidence on that,” answers Gates. “I dont have any evidence of that.”
He later states, “Just in terms of allocation of time resources, religion is not very efficient. Theres a lot more I could be doing on a Sunday morning.”

Bruce Lee
“Lee felt that anything which substituted the ways or beliefs of others in the place of teaching you how to cultivate your own was a step in the wrong direction. For this reason, Lee was opposed to the doctrines–or rather the dogmas–of organized religion.
When asked by journalist Alex Ben Block in the summer of 1972 what his religious affiliation was, Lee answered: None whatsoever.
Block then pressed him further, asking him if he then believed in God: To be perfectly frank, I really do not.
The submitter, Brad, comments Lees responses to these questions are perfectly understandable given the depth and nature of his philosophy. Lee believed that we are beings of self-made soul that were part of a vast, eternal process. Therefore, any person or organization that held creed or, in the martial arts nomenclature, style as the ideal was moving in the wrong direction, away from spiritual growth and knowledge of self…Lee was once asked by his younger brother Robert if he believed in God, to which he replied, I believe in sleeping.”

Angelina Jolie
“Lionsgate intends to make a film based on Russian author Ayn Rands Atlas Shrugged, and market it worldwide. According to Variety, Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt are considering leading roles in the film. Jolie is known to be a huge fan of Rand and her novel.” — from an April 27, 2006 IGN report [1] by Paul Davidson.
In the September 6, 2000 edition of The Onion A.V. Club titled “Is There A God?”, celebrities were asked the question. Jolie was among those asked.
Actress and tabloid fixture Angelina Jolie will soon play computer-game character Lara Croft.
The Onion: Is there a God?
Angelina Jolie: Hmm… For some people. I hope so, for them. For the people who believe in it, I hope so. There doesnt need to be a God for me. Theres something in people thats spiritual, thats godlike. I dont feel like doing things just because people say things, but I also dont really know if its better to just not believe in anything, either.

John Malkovich
John Malkovich, with 2 Oscar nominations and dozens of films to his credit, was in Chicago directing a play in January of 2000 at the Steppenwolf Theatre, which he helped found several years ago. The play was a fictionalized story about Sigmund Freud entitled “Hysteria.” He was interviewed by Martha Lavey for a WTTW Chicago Public television program entitled “Artbeat Chicago” which aired on January 6. Here, Malkovich explains his thoughts on Sigmund Freud:
“I think he was fantastic, a fantastic man. I mean, flawed, sure, but I dont even know what that means. I think his basic premise is people are strong enough to bear and to comprehend, and if they could remember and name the source of various griefs and sorrows, that they would, by that act, be able to live with them, and I think thats quite a fantastic notion.
I also particularly like him because he was an atheist, and I grew tired of religion some time not long after birth. I believe in people, I believe in humans, I believe in a car, but I dont believe something I cant have absolutely no evidence of for millenniums. And its funny — people think analysis or psychiatry is mad, and THEY go to CHURCH…”

The Agnostic : Antonio Banderas
From an interview in People Magazine, April 2006
Q: The movie [Take the Lead] has an uplifting message. Are you religious?
A: I have to recognize that I am agnostic. I don’t believe in any kind of fundamentalism. I prefer to take life in a different way, with a sense of humor. I try to teach my kids to be open. Whatever they believe is fine with me.
Charles Darwin
Charles Robert Darwin (1809-1882), biologist who founded evolutionary biology by raising the concept of descent with modification from vague speculation to rigorous science. He proposed an important mechanism, natural selection, though he did not think that it was the exclusive mechanism of evolution. His published his Origin of Species when he learned that Alfred Russel Wallace had also thought of natural selection, caling it an “abstract” of a much larger tome that he one day hoped to write. He carefully avoided discussing the question of human evolution, instead treating it in some later books like The Descent of Man.
He performed naturalist duties in his famous Beagle voyage, which he later wrote at length about, and he did detailed studies of barnacles and orchids, showing how their various parts were modified in different ways to serve different purposes.
He started out as a rather orthodox Anglican who had wanted to become a country clergyman, but his religious beliefs gradually evolved toward agnosticism; in his biography, he wrote things like
I can indeed hardly see how anyone ought to wish Christianity to be true; for if so the plain language of the text seems to show that the men who do not believe, and this would include my Father, Brother and almost all my best friends, will be everlastingly punished. And this is a damnable doctrine. (p. 87)

Umberto Eco  : Writer
Umberto Eco is an Italian writer best known for his novel “The Name of the Rose.” The book was made into a movie starring Sean Connery. His religious beliefs are summed up by Nora Gallagher in an LA Times review of his latest book, “Belief or Nonbelief? A Confrontation.”
Gallagher says:
Eco is the nonbeliever, an agnostic intellectual who left the church when he was 22, but he is neither angry nor anti-religious. He thinks that a person may not believe in God but “one should not have the arrogance to declare that God does not exist.”

Uma Thurman : Actress
From an About Uma bio published November 1995 in Cosmopolitian magazine:
Full Name: Uma Karuna Thurman Place of Birth: Boston, Massachusetts, USA Date of Birth: April 29, 1970 Current Residence: New York City, New York, USA Current Occupation: Film Actress Religion: Agnostic (Buddhism if must choose)
“I grew up in a mostly Buddhist environment. My father, when very young, was the first American to be ordained as a Buddhist monk. He now teaches Indo-Tibetan studies at Columbia University and is regarded as this countrys foremost authority on Buddhism. When the Dalai Lama comes to America, its my father who is his host. When asked if I consider myself Buddhist, the answer is, Not really. But its more my religion than any other because I was brought up with it in an intellectual and spiritual environment. I dont practice or preach it, however. But Buddhism has had a major effect on who I am and how I think about the world. What I have learned is that I like all religions, but only parts of them.”

Roman Polanski : Film Director
His autobiography, Roman, describes him as an atheist. He intentionally made “Rosemarys Baby” ambiguous so that it can be interpreted as having no genuine supernatural events (all just in Mia Farrows head).
Apparently Polanski has drifted from atheist to agnostic. The following is from a March 5, 2000 New York Post interview discussing his [recent] movie, The Ninth Gate, starring Johnny Depp:
Polanski, who has previously made movies about satanism and vampires, claimed to have no interest in the occult.
“Im totally disinterested, personally, with that sort of thing,” he said. “It does absolutely nothing for me. Im neither religious nor superstitious. At best I can be counted as an agnostic. Science and technology get me a lot more excited.” –BZ

The Ambiguous : Arthur C. Clarke
See his autobiography. Also, in The Making of Kubricks 2001, Clarke says that he is an atheist.
It may be that our role on this planet is not to worship God, but to create him.
— Arthur C. Clarke
In an April 1, 1997 profile in the New York Times Clarke speaks about his new book 3001, the latest and perhaps final in the series of books beginning with 2001:
In the world of 3001 Clarke envisions for the story, the writer of the piece, John F. Burns, says: “Perhaps most controversially, religions of all kinds have fallen under a strict taboo, with the citizenry looking back on the religious beliefs and practices of earlier ages as products of ignorance that caused untold strife and bloodshed. But the concept of a God, known by the Latin word Deus, survives, a legacy of mans continuing wonder at the universe.
“In this, Clarke is giving vent to one of the few things that seem to ruffle his equable nature. Religion is a byproduct of fear, he says. For much of human history, it may have been a necessary evil, but why was it more evil than necessary? Isnt killing people in the name of God a pretty good definition of insanity? ”
28 May 2001 – A reader reports that in a CNN interview when Clarke was asked if he believed in God, he replied, “I do not believe in God, but I do not disbelieve in her either.” If anybody can confirm this and provide a date of the interview, please send it in. Thanks.
A reader writes: Arthur C. Clarke was a strong atheist. When he was in the British military, he was adamant about having his religion listed as atheist. Refer to his biography for more info.

Dalai Lama
“Basically, religions may be divided into two groups. One group, including Judaism, Christianity, Islam, and some ancient Indian traditions, I call God religions. Their fundamental faith is in a Creator. The other group of religious tradition, including Jainism, Buddhism, I usually call godless religions. They do not believe in a Creator. But, of course, God is a sense of infinite love. The religions are not so different in this understanding. But God in the sense of Creator, something absolute, that is difficult to accept.
“According to some, godless religion is more effective; according to others, God religions are more effective. The position is individual; it is a matter of choice.”
Update (28-May-01): A reader writes in with some background describing how Buddhists (and presumably the Dalai Lama) think of gods:
“This is one of the fuzzy areas of Buddhism, and one that is hard to explain … while there are gods in most branches of Buddhism, they are not of the same stature as Yaweh, Allah, or even Zeus. They are not omnipotent, omniscient, nor worshipped in the Judeo-christian sense of the word. For most Buddhists, these have the same stature as Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy.
“They are in some ways a role model or target behavior: Kwan Yin being a model for compassionate behavior in Chinese Buddhism, the various colors of Tara are models for healing, compassion or protective behavior in Tibetan. In this way, they are used during meditation as a focus point, almost a visual aid for guided visualization.
“They are also used as a symbolic way to talk about something by personifying it: Mara is the goddess of evil and temptation but only for purposes of discussing evil as an abstraction or worldly force. Demons were used in old teaching tales to play the part of the undesireable behavior, and gods or minor dieties played the part of the good guys.
“Complicating things further, Buddhism usually grafted itself onto a healthy local culture with a strong shamanic tradition in the local religion. And because Buddhism has no one True God requirement, the local religions and the gods of that culture usually persist in a slightly altered form. Among a local peasantry in most Buddhist areas you will find that they take the local gods and demons more seriously than urban Buddhists of the same area do. But because Buddhism emphasizes behaviors more than beliefs, if a Javanese village wants to have a ceremony to placate the Water Demon, they are not considered any less Buddhist for it.”

Natalie Portman
Rolling Stones: 20 June 2002, Vol. 1, Iss. 898, pg. 52-58, by: Chris Heath, “The Private Life of Natalie Portman”
Of her religion, Portman says, “Im much more like the product of a doctor than I am a Jew.” She is uncomfortable about the concept of the afterlife. “I dont believe in that. I believe this is it, and I believe its the best way to live.”

Monica Lewinsky : former Presidential Mistress
TIME: What steps are you taking to put your life back together?
Lewinsky: I think probably the biggest step that I am taking is trying to work on myself in therapy. Its hard. Its painful.
TIME: You have been praying from time to time?
Lewinsky: I think, for me, my definition of praying might be a little different. I think, for me, in some ways therapy is sort of praying. Its like what you learn in therapy and what you walk away with. You kind of think to yourself, oh, I really hope that I can learn to assimilate. But Im not very religious.
from “My Story: Exclusive interview and photos of Monica Lewinsky”, TIME magazine, March 15, 1999, p. 36.

Whipping therapy cures depression and suicide crises

The effect is astounding: a patient starts seeing only bright colors in the surrounding world.
Russian scientists from the city of Novosibirsk, Siberia, made a sensational report at the international conference devoted to new methods of treatment and rehabilitation in narcology. The report was called “Methods of painful impact to treat addictive behavior.”
Siberian scientists believe that addiction to alcohol and narcotics, as well as depression, suicidal thoughts and psychosomatic diseases occur when an individual loses his or her interest in life. The absence of the will to live is caused with decreasing production of endorphins – the substance, which is known as the hormone of happiness. If a depressed individual receives a physical punishment, whipping that is, it will stir up endorphin receptors, activate the “production of happiness” and eventually remove depressive feelings.

Russian scientists recommend the following course of the whipping therapy: 30 sessions of 60 whips on the buttocks in every procedure. A group of drug addicts volunteered to test the new method of treatment: the results can be described as good and excellent.
Doctor of Biological Sciences, Sergei Speransky, is a very well known figure in Novosibirsk. The doctor became one of the authors of the shocking whipping therapy. The professor used the self-flagellation method to cure his own depression; he also recovered from two heart attacks with the help of physical tortures too.
“The whipping therapy becomes much more efficient when a patients receives the punishment from a person of the opposite sex. The effect is astounding: the patient starts seeing only bright colors in the surrounding world, the heartache disappears, although it will take a certain time for the buttocks to heal, of course,” Sergei Speransky told the Izvestia newspaper.
Read the entire article here.